Showing posts with label Chinese Technology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chinese Technology. Show all posts

3.6.12

The sky's the limit | James Fallows new book on the Chinese aerospace ambitions

2012-06-01 07:56:19.0Kelly Chung DawsonThe sky's the limit1811066442People2@usa/enpproperty-->

Author explores potential of Chinese aviation

Beyond standard economic indicators of prosperity, certain industries can be seen as a microcosm of a country's maturity. James Fallows' new book, China Airborne, argues that Chinese aviation is such an industry, worthy of closer examination for what its successes and shortcomings reflect about China's technological and social progress.

"There are a number of industries that have significance beyond themselves," Fallows says.

"If a country succeeds in those industries, it indicates a larger range of accomplishment and networks of sophisticated production, and aerospace is one of these high-end industries.

"Countries that have successful aerospace industries are capable of building sophisticated operation systems, maintaining safety standards, and can pull off the integration of military, civilian and weather systems on an international level," he says.

 The sky's the limit

James Fallows sees the aviation industry as a microcosm of China's maturity in his new book. Provided to China Daily

"It's a microcosm of the larger Chinese effort to become a higher-value modern economy, and it seemed to me to deserve attention as a test case for China's emergence."

China Airborne traces the history of the nation's commercial airline industry and its more recent attempts to compete as an aircraft manufacturer. Once rated among the most dangerous to fly, Chinese airlines now boast some of the lowest crash rates in the world. But Chinese airplane manufacturers lag behind international competitors in innovation and design - a telling sign, Fallows says.

"There are major catch-up efforts to build regional jets and larger jetliners, and the test is whether these Chinese factories will be able to take the next step up. It has not happened yet, but Boeing and Airbus are very attentive to what will happen in China over the next few years."

In 2011, the Chinese government unveiled its 12th Five-Year Plan (2011-2015), in which it pledged 1.5 trillion yuan ($237 billion, 189 billion euros) to develop the national aerospace industry in the form of new airports, navigation systems and planes. As of 2010, the country counted 2,600 commercial planes, about half as many as in the US, with a target of 4,500 by 2016.

Construction of 150 new airports is already under way in China, although Fallows seems to argue that growth can sometimes surpass actual need. Much of China's airspace is highly regulated and in some cases off-limits due to military reasons, severely curtailing the potential of the private small-aircraft industry.

But as Fallows notes, Boeing executives have declared China the sole source of hope "that the world aviation industry is beginning to recover".

China Airborne also outlines the history of Chinese involvement in aviation and aerospace. A Chinese engineer, Wong Tsu, played a significant role in the development of the US industry in the early 1900s, Fallows writes. Born in Beijing in 1893 and sent to England for naval cadet training, Wong eventually became a student at MIT, in the country's first aeronautical engineering program. In 1916 he joined Bill Boeing in Seattle as the Boeing Co's first chief engineer. In fact he designed the Model C plane, the first aircraft Boeing sold to the US military.

China had its first flight in 1909, only six years after the Wright brothers' fixed-wing gas-powered plane made history on a North Carolina beach. But the gap between Chinese and US technologies only widened over time.

For a period, China used only Soviet-made planes. When the then US President Richard Nixon flew to China in 1972 aboard the Boeing 707 that was Air Force One, the simple question of how he would disembark to the runway 20 feet below created a small crisis, Fallows writes. Soviet aircraft were built at a different height and the airport was unprepared for Nixon's visit. Ultimately, Chinese builders rushed production of a set of stairs built from published 707 specs and photographs of similar portable stairways.

During that trip, Premier Zhou Enlai approved the purchase of 10 Boeing 707s as a goodwill gesture, Fallows writes. "This purchase - like all major airline sales in the modern age - was as much a diplomatic gesture as a commercial transaction, constituting a big and noticeable US export to China."

Decades later, when President Hu Jintao visited the US in 2006, his very first stop was a Boeing factory outside Seattle. While touring the assembly line, he spoke to about 5,000 Boeing workers. "Boeing is a household name in my country," Hu said. "When Chinese people fly, it is mostly in a Boeing plane. I am happy to tell you that I came to the United States on a Boeing plane."

Fallows makes the important point that because their products enable travel between nations, airline companies and their executives are de facto diplomats in geopolitics.

"One of the reasons I wanted to tell the story of Boeing's role in China was that while living in China, I was really impressed at the thousands of less-publicized levels of interaction that occur between the two countries," Fallows says.

"For Boeing, they recognized that in many parts of the world, sales are not only commercial decisions but also political decisions. On the Chinese side, Boeing was viewed as a branch of the US government. And in Boeing's role as this quasi-governmental body, it was able to get involved in air-safety ventures and air-traffic issues. Much of the miracle of making Chinese airline travel so much safer has involved intense work between Boeing and the Chinese side."

The American company brought in Western experts to train Chinese airline officials and regulators, and worked to bring China's air industry up to international standards.

"Boeing had a direct stake in improving the safety record of Chinese airlines and felt it had a responsibility to do what it could," writes Fallows.

"If commercial airliners kept crashing - as five of them did within a four-month span in 1992, including an accident in southern China in which more than 140 people aboard a Boeing 737 died - neither Chinese nor foreign passengers would ride on them, and Boeing's prospects would be limited. Thus, making Chinese airlines safer became Boeing's job."

While China's contributions to airline manufacturing remain unremarkable, the government took a huge step in moving toward innovation in 2011 when the State-owned Aviation Industry Corporation of China bought US manufacturer Cirrus Industries, known for its state-of-the-art small-propeller airplanes, and Teledyne Industries' piston engine business, which equips small aircraft including Cirrus planes.

"That is a very significant sign of Chinese sophistication," Fallows says. "It's a sign of their potential. It is an interesting choice, and I expect more purchases like that. I think that the people on the Chinese investment side are sophisticated in their purchases - they know if they do too much, there would be an adverse reaction in the US. They are being cautious, but there will be more of this, knowing the kind of ambition that's present in the Chinese industry."

Fallows, who was a speechwriter for former US President Jimmy Carter before his longtime journalism career with the Atlantic, published the 2001 book Free Flight about the US airline industry. He called the experience of reporting and writing China Airborne inspiring.

"I had a lot of fun working on this book and going out to these remote areas, where people were cooking up new airports and had big dreams," he says. "It was very stimulating. If you are interested in life and things changing, China is a very interesting place. The air industry is a field that I have pre-existing interest in, so it was a rewarding way for me to learn more about China.

"I ended up thinking about how much more varied China is than most Americans know, and if you look closely at the particular case of an industry or region or technology, you can see reflections of the country on a larger scale. This is a field in which China is trying to rise to the top, and its success or difficulties in fulfilling that dream will broadly indicate the success or limit of its technological ambition in general. If these Chinese can succeed in aerospace, there's nothing they can't succeed in."

kdawson@chinadailyusa.com

(China Daily 06/01/2012 page21)

Great review of James Fallows' new book, China Airborne, about the ambitious Chinese aviation industry. Fallows is one of my favorite China watchers and this book is officially on my summer reading list. What I want to know about the Chinese aviation industry is when will there be a Chinese competitor to Airbus and Boeing?

16.4.12

First US-China tech incubator launches | chinadaily.com.cn

2012-04-13 11:28:58.0Zhang Qidong in Santa Clara, CaliforniaFirst US-China tech incubator launches1811040061Home2@usa/enpproperty-->

First US-China tech incubator launches

Ken Wilcox, chairman of Silicon Valley Bank, speaks at InnoSpring's opening ceremony on April 11. Chang Jun / China Daily

InnoSpring, Silicon Valley's first US-China technology startup incubator, officially opened its doors on April 11 to Chinese returnees starting their own companies and American entrepreneurs seeking to enter the Chinese market.

InnoSpring, created from a joint partnership of a consortium of Chinese and American financial institutions - Tsinghua University Science Park, Shui On Group, Northern Light Venture and Silicon Valley Bank - is expected to compete with leading local incubators by providing a full range of services to its beneficiaries.

"Newly inducted incubatees joining InnoSpring's ecosystem can leverage our US-China focus as well as receive customized incubator services," said Eugene Zhang, president of InnoSpring. "Today, we crossed our first milestone and eagerly look forward to building InnoSpring for the long haul."

Twelve technology startup companies have already been selected and will settle into InnoSpring's 1,350-square-meter facility. InnoSpring plans to select 15 companies every six months for its "Seed Program". These companies will receive an initial $25,000 investment at the outset of the program.

The Seed Program is akin to a 6-month boot camp for entrepreneurs who aim to complete a prototype, assemble a core team and conduct initial customer feedback.

Select startups will also have the opportunity to receive additional funds of up to $250,000 in capital from TEEC Angel Fund, bringing the maximum initial investment amount to $275,000.

Ken Wilcox, chairman of Silicon Valley Bank, said the establishment of InnoSpring is a sign of true innovation between China and the US.

"Chinese engineers and high tech professionals have made major contribution to technology innovation in Silicon Valley. The creation of InnoSpring tells us again that innovation has no borders, and most progress can be made where there is collaboration between different parties," he said.

Xia Shuguang with the San Francisco Consul of Economic & Commercial Office described the incubation center as a "nest where future golden eggs are being hatched".

"We will help set up the best incubation platform to help technology startup companies to go through the initial stage of business innovation," said Lei Yang, managing director of Northern Light Venture Capital.

"The life cycle of business starts with innovation. Our goal is to eliminate the globalization barrier and make the Silicon Valley's technology innovation a global innovation," Yang said.

The VC managing director also said InnoSpring can accommodate up to 40 startups in its office space. The company also give access to venture capitalists and angel investors, mentor executives and entrepreneurs, give business and funding advice, provide entrepreneurial workshops and assist in assembling core teams recruiting.

"We also offer cross-border development for US and Chinese startups, and access to Chinese public agencies to facilitate China expansion for US startups, which basically cut all the barriers out for both side to achieve their goals better and faster," Yang said.

kellyzhang@chinadailyusa.com

Doors open at the first US-China technology incubator in Silicon Valley.

15.1.12

China's med-tech market to grow 17% in 2012 | MassDevice.com

January 12, 2012 by MassDevice staff

The Chinese medical device market is slated to grow 17% in 2012, survey says.

MassDevice On Call

MASSDEVICE ON CALL —China's medical device market is set to grow 17% in 2012, according to a Citigroup hospital survey.

Major medical equipment in the Chinese market include medical monitors and life support, diagnostic imaging, in vitro diagnostics and therapeutic systems.

GE Healthcare (NYSE:GE) leads the Chinese medical equipment market, but in orthopedics and drug-eluting stents, Medtronic (NYSE:MDT), Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) and Stryker (NYSE:SYK) take the lead, according to the report.

Sign up to get our free newsletters delivered straight to your inbox


Citigroup's survey, which was based on responds from 383 Chinese hospitals across 29 provinces and cities, also named med-tech titans Philips (NYSE:PHG) and Siemens (NYSE:SI) as leaders in China's med-tech market.

Domestic manufacturers such as Mindray Medical (NYSE:MR), Wandong and Aeon have tapped into the market with the sale of market of patient monitors, anesthesia machines and radiography machines.

The 2012 growth will be largely due to bigger budgets and planned infrastructure upgrades from Chinese hospitals, according to analysts.

State lawmakers push Supreme Court to uphold Obamacare
More than 480 state lawmakers plan to file a brief urging the Supreme Court to uphold President Obama's health care reform law, according to TheHill.com. The group includes at least 1 lawmaker from every state, including the 26 states whose attorneys general are suing to overturn the law's individual insurance mandate. Read more

Device detects cancer cells before they become tumors
University of Missouri researchers' photoacoustic device can detect cancer cells before they become tumors, according to a press release. The laser-induced ultrasound system will soon be available to scientists for cancer studies and will be tested in clinical trials for the early diagnosis of metastic melanoma. Read more

Stanmore Implants launches personalized knee replacement system
Stanmore Implants Worldwide launched the first patient-specific modular knee implant system. Stanmore's system combines robotic bone preparation with a patient specific design gathered during CT scans. Read more

Med-tech causes Iowa fire
A fire in Waterloo, Iowa was likely caused by a malfunctioning medical device, according to the WCF Courier. The fire, which caused nearly $20,000 in damages at an assisted living facility, started when unattended medical equipment was left on a resident's bed. Read more

Permalink

US and EU medical technology companies need to start making plans to take their products to China before the country is able to develop its own medical device national champions. Once the country has the capacity to develop everything themselves, the West should expect their products to be largely shutout of what will be the world's largest market one day.

14.7.09

Finally: China stops shock therapy for Internet addicts due to lack of effectiveness data


It was more than two years ago when I first blogged about China's use of shock therapy to "cure" individuals of their internet addictions, and today it seems as if the Chinese have decided to abandon such cruel techniques.

Of course, the treatments are only stopping because research conducted at the institution administering the treatments showed it had no measurable effect on the usage of video games by the 3000 young Chinese who were chosen to participate in the program. I am not sure if this speaks more to the Chinese diligence for measuring and quantifying anything/everything, or to their cruel pragmatism when asserting their authority over its citizens. Either way, we should all take note of the casual acceptance of such draconian practices by the one government we are counting on to keep our country out of bankruptcy and our economy from going even deeper into the crapper. It is a scary future for America, a scary future indeed.
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

10.1.08

Chinese detail ambitious space program in 2008



AP: China to Launch Rockets in Olympic Year



Wired Science: China Details 2008 Space Plans



The Chinese government has just released details of its planned space flights for 2008, leaving few to doubt the true emergence of a third player in the geo-political battle for control over near-Earth orbit. The boldest mission will be the third manned space flight launched by China and will feature the first spacewalk by a Chinese astronaut.



The much anticipated mission will be Shenzhou 7, and is slated for October. This will be a glorious time in Chinese history, provided the government can manage the seemingly impossible challenge of the Summer Olympics, and this human spacewalk will be the cherry on the proverbial sundae for the CCP leadership.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

18.10.07

China sees US as a partner in future space exploration initiatives...

Insignia of the Chinese Lunar Exploration Prog...Image via WikipediaSPACE.com -- China Hopes for Place on Space Station

The Chinese have announced that they hope to be included in the international space station (ISS) project, which has been in operation since 2000 under the control of US, Russian and European astronauts. China has only recently become the third nation to launch a man into space on its own, and if it joins the ISS it would be the 17th nation participating in the long-term orbital experimentation platform. The US has thus far relented from including the Chinese in ISS missions because of the ideological stigma of a strong Communist Chinese space program operating as an equal with NASA and its now democratic Russian partners.
China frightened many in the scientific community last year when it obliterated an aging weather satellite with a ground-based anti-satellite missile. It was the first time any nation, the US and Russia included, had conducted such a test of a land-based missile and has fueled concerns around the world that we are on the verge of an arms race in space. Such experiments can pose real threats to the long-term space exploration capability of mankind, as debris clutters and inhibits near-Earth orbit, making missions to the furtherest reaches of the solar system more complicated and dangerous.

China will launch a lunar probe to map the moon's surface later this month, though they are significantly behind their Japanese rivals, who have just this week seen their lunar orbiter around Earth's only natural satellite. The regional space race will become even more heated once India launches their lunar module next April.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

24.2.07

China uses "shock therapy" to cure internet addiction...



Tech2.com India > China Launches Campaign For Net Addicts > News on Internet



MSNBC- China treats internet "addicts" sternly



According to several international news outlets, the Chinese government has decided to take severe measures to curb the internet addiction that has afflicted many of the countries younger citizens. Using shock therapy, the government hopes to discourage these internet users, who often spend every minute they are awake in internet cafes playing video games and chatting with their friends, from maintaining unhealthy levels of usage. I doubt that the government will find the international reaction to this controversial program to be very favorable, and it certainly won't do very much to bolster the countries image in the eyes of the world. Can anyone seriously consider China to be a civilized nation when they have such Draconian policies for dealing with excessive internet usage?


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

16.2.07

Chinese launch rival to US Global Positioning System (GPS)...





FT.com / Asia-Pacific / China - China launches first navigation satellite



Beidou Navigation System



After nearly twenty years of geo-spacial monopoly, the US GPS system, which so many people around the world have come to rely on when traveling to an unknown destination. The European Union has recently closed in on full operational capability of their real-time navigational system Galileo, and the Chinese took major steps toward implementing a third in the launch of a key satellite over the weekend in their Beidou Navigation System.


There exists fundamental differences between the US system and its EU contemporary which are as indicative of the fundamental differences in the guiding economic philosophies of the two continents. The GPS system that has been in operation under the Department of Defense since the 1970's has, since its declassification, been open for use at no cost to any company that can harness its vast capacities for use at the level of the individual consumer or corporate entity. Since that time the US has embraced GPS culture and all of our ground based commercial traffic is guided by the pulsing satellites that make up the GPS network. Galileo will take a different approach, instead charging its users a fee for usage with the value-added benefits not entirely clear as of yet, though to be fair, the system is hardly up and running.


The Beidou (Chinese name for the "Big Dipper" constellation) Navigation System is even further down the road than Magellan, and just as the US and EU networks are reflections of the fundamental economic differences that exist between the two Western civilizations, the Chinese strategy for its commercialization strategy is like all other economic policies in China: vague and highly speculative.


As the Chinese become wealthier and their country-sides are transformed into concrete jungles awash in semi-trucks and FedEx vans, their decision to enter the Global-Positioning market early and aggressively will likely prove to have been wise. If they choose, as I suspect they will, to follow the path of the free markets paved by their American competitor they will most likely outshine the Galileo network even if they are years behind in bringing the service to consumers.


Considering China is still a developing economy by official classification, it should be noted that they are making aggressive commercial, and not just militaristic advances in the space industry. If American policymakers, entrepreneurs and bankers heed the warnings that such an aggressive push by a growing competitor into an industry with limitless potential the US should have no problem competing with the Middle Kingdom anywhere in the known universe.



Reblog this post [with Zemanta]